Thursday, May 29, 2014

DDLJ sucks!


Yes, you read it right. Dilwale Dulhaniya Le Jayenge, the 1995 blockbuster, and one of the highest grossing movies of all times, is a horrible movie.
---------------------------------------------
  • First things first : the title itself is wrong! See this figure below and get the point. Here, Dulhaniya is a prize (not a human being), which the Dilwala will lift and 'take away'. So the movie begins with objectification of women as trophies : whoever achieves 'it', is the hero!
  • Patriarchal : the movie is the ultimate patriarchal movie.The movie depicts double standards for men and women, shamelessly. "Indian Culture" stands for "daughter being shy before the father" and not expressing herself! A wife is supposed to to be quiet before the husband! See how Lajjo (Farida Jalaal) behaves before Baldev Singh (Amrish Puri) : she is the meek and docile wife, constantly scared of her ever-dominating, almost Hitler-ish husband.

  • The girl (Simran) has no life of her own. She is simply waiting to fall in love and get married and play Ghar-Ghar for the rest of her life. Early morning on a weekday, when her dad is going for his business and her sister is going to school, the heroine is writing romantic poems, dancing in the rain waiting for her lover to come and fulfill her dreams. Height of joblessness! Where is her career? Is her aim in life simply to romance the hero?

  • The hero is a college drop-out! He has no job, no income, no identity of his own, Yet, he is enjoying Europe and pursuing his lady-love to India with his millionaire dad's money! What is his curriculum Vitae? ZERO! 
  • The girl has to live under the command of men : she has to beg of her father, for one month of her life to live life according to her own terms. She strikes a deal with him, that after a month, she will compromise and surrender to the male-dominated society. How regressive can Yash Chopra get?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  • It is OK for guys to flirt with strangers! The guy can accost the girl, strike a conversation forcibly, intrude into the girl's physical personal space, irritate her non-stop. Why does the girl not slap him? Why can't the girl hold her own, give cold vibes, and ask him to 'shut the @#$% up', or call the police?
  • If a girl tries to assert herself (or take revenge of her insult), she will be 'tamed' in public. And she has to digest repeated insults. The hero even tears the heroine's dress! When the hero gets drunk, he manhandles her, that too when she is a a wet swimming costume! Yash Chopra seems to be a misogynist.         
  • But keeping your hymen intact till marriage is the greatest virtue of an Indian woman!!! 
  • Also, Indian women are portrayed as naive and stupid; and they lose control upon drinking!
  • The heroine knows that she cannot make her own choices in life.

  • All Indian girls are emotional fools, silly, innocent, sentimental, suckers for romance! Why cannot she laugh off his concocted 'proposal'? Why does she get swept off her feet so easily? Does she ever bother to ask herself, "Is he really good enough for me?". Is it that easy to charm a woman who is intelligent enough to respect herself? Only a romantic fool will allow herself to be carried away like this! Plain silly! Look at the two pictures below, and see how her emotions are out of her control, and the guy has completely captured her feelings. Where is her own brain? C'mon Simram, what did you see in him?           


---------------- Interval -----------------
  • A mother teaches/convinces/requests her daughter to sacrifice and compromise before patriarchy. She tells her that she is fighting a losing battle. She tells here, "Women have to sacrifice as daughters, sisters, wives, and mothers. We cannot live our lives according to our own terms. We have to sacrifice for men all the time, since men will never sacrifice anything for us". 
             
  • A woman has to starve on Karwa Chauth for the long life of her husband. Why not the other way round : the boy fasting and praying for the girl's long life and well-being? We have never seen a guy praying for a woman, even when the wife is in labor! The song lyrics go as "Tere haath se pi kar paani, daasi se ban jaaun raani"....OMG, give me a break, you subservient woman! Is he someone to salvage you and give you status?                  
  • Finally, there is a single scene in the movie where the mother takes a bold step, as asks her daughter to live her life according to her own terms. What a welcome relief! But sadly, short-lived. The guy has his own ego to satisfy, and talks his would-be MIL out of her resolve. It is a Bollywood movie yaar : the hero has to have the last word! Or is it like, in our society, men have the last word, irrespective of age and status? 
              
  • As the girl's father comes to know of the affair, all hell breaks loose! A woman is either the father's property or a husband's property! "Ab Simran aapki pareshaani nahin, meri pareshaani hain". So a woman is a problem is someone's life, whether parents or husband or in-laws! See this picture here : a woman is merely a transferable good, which the two parties (pita and pati) are negotiating about! The current owner of the good, the father, refuses to give 'it' to the future owner, who is requesting him for 'it'.
  • The girl has a suitor (total MCP). The two guys are fighting for the girl, just as two dogs fight for one piece of bone. Each one is trying to outdo the other to win her as a trophy : winning the girl is considered as an act of heroism, just as they said in the olden monarchy days, "Kanya-haran mein veerta siddha hoti hain".
  • Meanwhile, the girl begs and begs her father to let her marry the man of her choice.
  • Finally, the brainless climax : see figure below. But understand the symbolism of the scene : the guy is 'going ahead', and the girl is 'catching up' with him, leaving behind her parents as 'the losing team'. This scene encapsulates the essence of patriarchy!

2 comments:

Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said...

I suspect no-one is going to read this but hell! I'm going to comment anyways ---

Could not have said it better! The only thing I feel the need to correct that both guys and girls could and should be able to flirt with strangers. I mean it's a good tool to start up a relationship. EXCEPT what raj did was not flirting. It was harassment that should not be tolerated by anyone who respects him/herself. Given that simran was portrayed as a timid little 'gudia', it is kind of understandable that she fell in love with raj but her lover could have been anyone else hell bent to harass girls to death. Had she ever met kuljeet before raj, she would have fallen in love with him. In fact I cannot tell the difference between kuljeet's personality and raj's (pre simran) personality. You can literally replace raj with kuljeet and nothing will be changed. Kuljeet would have stopped 'flirting' with other 'memaan-shemaan' and would have set his heart on simran while she struggles to convince her dad to not marry him to raj who constantly says, 'kisi ki aankhein sundar hain, kisi ke honth, aur kisi ke baal'..... Astonishing!